0

Hill: Proposed Channel 23 policy a political ploy

CONYERS -- The Republican candidate for chairman of the Rockdale Board of Commissioners weighed in Tuesday on the county's decision not to tape forums or debates to be aired on public access Channel 23.

Jason Hill, who is challenging incumbent Chairman Richard Oden, charged that the decision not to tape political forums is not based on the need for a policy, as stated by the county, but is designed to benefit Oden's campaign. Hill noted that taping and airing forums on Channel 23 has been a common county practice until this year.

Tonya Parker, director of Community Affairs and Innovative Programs for the county, said Monday her department is in the process of developing a policy regarding taping forums and other events to air on Channel 23. She said a policy is needed in order to treat all such requests fairly and equitably.

"At best, (the county's decision) is politically motivated as the chairman doesn't want to have that debate;" said Hill, "at worst, it is plain and simply trying to keep another point of view, different from his own, off the local community channel."

Oden was out of town Wednesday and could not be reached for comment.

The debate over whether the county would or would not tape such events developed during the primary election season after the Conyers-Rockdale Chamber of Commerce was told that the county would not tape a forum sponsored by the Chamber.

An email sent by Parker to the Chamber in June indicated that the county already had a policy in place that prohibited taping forums.

"As far as taping the forum, we won't be able to do so unfortunately because it is now board policy to not film these types of events based on legal review of our agreement with Comcast," Parker wrote. She added that despite what the county had done in the past, "It's the current leadership's interpretation of the agreement."

Parker said Wednesday that her earlier interpretation of the Comcast agreement was "very general" and acknowledged that she was incorrect in her assessment that the agreement would not allow taping of outside events. She said she now understood from County Attorney Qader Baig that the Comcast contract would allow taping of events if that is what the county chooses to do.

Hill, who previously served as Post 1 commissioner, said he was disturbed that the decision not to tape the Chamber forum was passed off as a policy issue "when no written policy exists. And that the reason for not taping them was because of a legal review that does not exist in written form. At least neither existed when I asked for them."

Hill went on to say that he had asked Commissioner JaNice Van Ness about the purported policy and she knew nothing about it.

"If it was board policy, shouldn't the whole board know? The story continues to change as this decision has become more public," he said.

Van Ness said earlier this week that, in her position as commissioner, she would sponsor an upcoming Chamber forum that is still in the planning stages.

Van Ness also said she is working with Parker to develop a policy regarding taping events other than county functions.

Hill said he views taping the forums as a community service and believes the practice should continue. "I know we did it when I was on the Board of Commissioners, because we felt it was the right thing to do and a service to the community," he said. "I was always proud of the work that I did as a commissioner and stood behind the decisions I made. I was never hesitant to discuss those decisions with or in front of anyone. Of course, if I had made some of the decisions the current chairman has made, I would not want to have to defend them in a debate with me either."

Comments

smshep5 1 year, 11 months ago

Wonders never cease...using position to minimize the opportunity for the TAX PAYERS and voters of this county to hear a debate of opinions at a critical time for our county is NOT democracy. I guess when you make yourself CEO it's obvious that you are looking at your own personal gain first. I know who I will be voting for in the election, the question is do others that have the same rights and privileges have the ability to do what is right. The men and women we elect work for us, the taxpayers. We are the boss so let's fire our CEO and get back to democracy for EVERYONE regardless of race or politics. Jason Hill seems to be the obvious choice all things considered

0

Elmo 1 year, 11 months ago

When the spotlight of truth shines bright, the roaches scurry for cover.

I'd like to see that debate happen between Hill and the current chairman ...er...I mean "CEO", but, an "executive order" will probably be issued to quash it.

I guess one-on-one challenges are not viewed favorably by the reigning king, or his court jester.

1

Freedom1 1 year, 11 months ago

The Chairman has never had a problem using county resources to promote himself, from expensive portraits plastered around the county to self-serving "messages" on 23 and the county website. I hope the Citizen does a bit of reporting and does a records request and prints a copy of the "policy". After attending the NAACP Forum, I can see why the Chairman doesn't want a one on one televised!

0

Elmo 1 year, 11 months ago

I didn't know about the portraits and using channel 23 "message from the chairman"... Sounds like someone is modeling their "reign" after the Obama administration right here in Rockdale.

It seems that the people are far less important than the "look how important I am" chairman. Seems to be all about self-aggrandizement than substance. Did we elect a dedicated official, or a truth-dodging showboat?

I guess no one told him it was an actual "job"...he probably would never have even run if he'd known that.

We need to flood his office with demands that he publicly debates his opponent to prove his competency to handle the position.

What's next, "czars" and bail-outs?

0

involvedtaxpayer 1 year, 11 months ago

Sadly, it appears an employee is forced to do the political bidding of superiors. I'd love to see the paper do a comprehensive report on the use of county property (land, facilities, employees, vehicles, time) for campaign purposes.

I hope the county attorney's advice has gone beyond contract review and that he and Ms. Parker have been counseling the commission on whether a policy serves or doesn't serve the public interest. But does either one of them live in Rockdale County, thereby actually knowing the community?

0

Frustrated 1 year, 11 months ago

My question would be is Channel 23 still airing the "message from the Chairman"? I would think this would be a violation of election and ethics rules. Wouldnt that also be considered giving him free campaign air time and wouldnt they have to offer the same time to Hill?

0

Elmo 1 year, 11 months ago

I'm not sure if I leased, local channel, on a subscription TV service (cable) is governed by the equal-time political rule, but it would be worth checking into.

But, insofar as taxpayer money is paying for the channel, I'm sure some public pressure could be brought to bear to try and make it happen.

Being elected "CEO" does not make the county offices your private playhouse, nor taxpayer funds your private piggybank.

0

Sookie 1 year, 11 months ago

Seems like there could be a court challenge made against the leadership over this invisible, unwritten policy. One of you lawyers out there step up and give Jason some guidance on getting a judge to step in here. These debates and this election is important.

0

Sign in to comment