0

Letter: We gain more than we lose from T-SPLOST

Judging from comments on the Newton Citizen and Rockdale Citizen websites, public sentiment must be running 20-to-1 against the T-SPLOST. Many people are angry about many things. Broken promises about the Ga. 400 toll booth. Unfulfilled plans for a Newton County Civic Center. Rockdale being a "donor" county. Taxes. Government. Politics. Lots of other stuff. There is plenty to be angry about. Voting against the T-SPLOST is a powerful way to express that anger. If that was all there is to it, I'd vote "No" too. Instead I'm voting "Yes," and I hope others will join me.

Some improvement is better than none. A "No" vote will leave us without the resources needed to make important improvements in the transportation system. Two years from now we'll be in the same boat, except that needs will be even greater and we'll be that much farther behind. The transportation system is a fundamental component of our economy and it affects every citizen every day. Torpedoing it to make a political point would be dramatic but counterproductive. Failure to maintain and improve our infrastructure is little different than blowing it up. Whether it crumbles over time or all at once, it is still in pieces. A "Yes" vote will not make the transportation system perfect, but will make it better.

There is more to gain than there is to lose. We work, reside, shop, worship and seek entertainment across county lines. A "No" vote on the basis of not wanting to pay for projects in other jurisdictions is kind of silly. We are all Georgians and most of us cross several county lines each day. What is there to lose in voting "Yes?" The additional tax will cost each family $10 for every $1,000 it spends on retail purchases. It will make little financial difference to any of us as individuals but makes a big impact for everyone as a community.

Neither Rockdale nor Newton can afford to vote no. There are severe penalties for counties and districts that vote against the T-SPLOST. The local match required for future transportation improvement expenses will be either 30 percent or 50 percent instead of 10 percent. So whether we vote "Yes" because we think it is the right thing to do, or because we feel we have a gun to our head, it is the only rational option.

The T-SPLOST is not perfect and will never have unanimous support. If it does pass, the implementation will be imperfect. There will likely be delays, cost overruns, and headline-grabbing cases of malfeasance. But the enduring legacy will be major infrastructure improvements that outweigh and outlive whatever mischief occurs along the way.

It is up to us as responsible stewards to exercise mature judgment even when doing so conflicts with our emotions. Please speak up and please vote "Yes" on July 31.

-- Chris Jueschke

Covington

Comments

trusslady 11 months, 1 week ago

I wish I could vote yes, but I will be voting no. I hear your argument that something is better than nothing, but after looking at the list of projects, looking at the proposed timelines and knowing that GDOT will be in charge, all work against your argument. We are constantly offered proposals for half-measures, because something is better than nothing. But in this case nothing is better than this. The projects on that list do little to address the traffic issues. Fixing airport runway lights and a new airport control tower, road paving and widening, pedestrian/bike pathways in parks, throwing money at MARTA - this is not a thought out plan for easing congestion. They tell us this is the project list, but we've already seen where they are adjusting/changing projects. This is a tax boondoggle of the worst kind. VOTE NO.

1

heresyafacts 11 months, 1 week ago

"But the enduring legacy will be major infrastructure improvements" Already, those involved have started to hint that while they will be able to begin projects, they likely will not have the money to complete them -- meaning what? Another TSPLOST when this one is finished? More toll roads? Already, sensing the vote is not going to go their way, the Governor has begun strongarming major companies into pushing their employees to vote for TSPLOST (or else!) and telling local politicos that if they don't do their part in supporting it, he will not support their bids for re-election. Already, those who were on the planning board are coming out against it, because the executive committee of that board -- those central select few who made the final decision on which projects to fund -- obviously chose those projects which would benefit their particular communities, not the region as a whole. If the TSPLOST were introduced for no other reason than to expand MARTA into a regional transit (extending to Augusta, Macon, Athens, Savannah, etc.), I would support it, because that would alleviate some traffic problems and benefit the population as a whole. If TSPLOST were devoted to creating alternate routes (an 'outer' perimeter) for through-traffic (transit trucks, travelers, tourists) who of necessity MUST pass through the Atlanta hub because of the current highway layout, I would support it, because that would mean less congestion. But as it stands, TSPLOST is a mishmash of projects that -- as many have already admitted -- will do little to solve the bumper-to-bumper issues of metro Atlanta; yet it is being advertised (falsely) as a fix. Taxpayers' money is too precious to be thrown at the wall like that anymore -- I will be voting against TSPLOST.

0

buck 11 months, 1 week ago

Vote no on T-SPLOST it's just another lifetime tax!

0

Sign in to comment