As of Tuesday, June 19, 2012
© Copyright 2013
Rockdale Citizen
Alcovy High School Principal LaQuanda Carpenter, left, sits with her attorney Stephanie Lindsey during Tuesday's motions hearing in Newton County Superior Court. Staff Photos: Sue Ann Kuhn-Smith
COVINGTON -- A Newton County Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday that the Newton Citizen does not yet have to reveal the identities of anonymous posters from its website.
During a nearly three-hour motions hearing in connection with a defamation lawsuit filed by Alcovy High School Principal LaQuanda Carpenter, Judge Eugene Benton ordered attorney Stephanie Lindsey to attempt to notify the anonymous posters as well as depose them and other witnesses before attempting to request identifying information from the newspaper.
Additionally, he ruled that the Georgia Shield statute applies to the case.
"The plaintiff cannot force the Newton Citizen to reveal the identities unless the plaintiff has used all other reasonable efforts to find them," said David Hudson, the attorney for the Georgia Press Association representing the Citizen.
Carpenter had filed a suit in April claiming originally that 11 web commenters posted libelous, defamatory comments and false information that subjected her to public hatred. She also subpoenaed the Citizen requesting all information and documents sufficient to identify the names, addresses and telephone numbers associated with the commenters, as well as documents reproducing the texts of the comments and all server logs, IP address logs, account information, account access records and application or registration forms related to the commenters.
Hudson filed a motion in May to quash the subpoena, citing that the Georgia Shield Law protects journalists against disclosing the information and also that the anonymous web posters are afforded protection under the First Amendment.
Both sides argued their points during the motions hearing Tuesday, citing previous court cases around the country dealing with similar issues, since Georgia has not previously seen a case like this.
Lindsey said the web comments were a "systematic approach to destroy (Carpenter's) reputation ... effectively causing a mob of people against her ... (and) making Dr. Carpenter look like she's the devil."
Hudson said that in addition to the comments being protected by the Shield law, only two of them could possibly be argued as defamatory if the facts in them are proven to be false.
He argued that most of the comments posted are opinion or commentary, protected by the First Amendment.
"It's a fundamental American right to speak anonymously," Hudson said, adding that public figures should know that members of the public might not always agree with the things they do and may speak out against them.
Under the Shield law, a plaintiff has to prove she cannot obtain the information elsewhere. Hudson told the judge that Lindsey already had claimed in an amendment to her suit that Newton County Board of Education Vice Chair Jeff Meadors had created three of the IDs to make comments on the site, proving she has alternative means to identify the web posters.
During the hearing, Lindsey attempted to call on Citizen editor Alice Queen to answer questions. Lindsey also had subpoenaed Newton County School System Superintendent Gary Mathews and each member of the school board to speak about Carpenter and prove the information in the postings is false, citing a need for an evidentiary hearing.
Shannon Black, an individual who has claimed two of the IDs, also was subpoenaed but has yet to be named in the suit.
Meadors was present with his attorney Jeff Foster of Foster & Hanks LLC in Monroe. Carpenter's husband, Dennis Carpenter, deputy superintendent of Operations at NCSS, also was present in the courtroom.
Lindsey said that she was ready to move forward with her case, call witnesses and enter evidence, and didn't want to waste the time of the court since they would end up back in the courtroom anyway.
"I don't understand why we're fighting the inevitable," she said. "There's no need to come back if we get the evidence today."
Benton told Lindsey that the motion hearing was not yet the time to call forth witnesses.
"That is what the trial is for," he said.
The judge also told Lindsey that proper notification had not been given to the web posters identified in the suit, although she claimed that they were provided notification since the Citizen wrote articles about the case and the web posters made comments on the articles.
"We didn't have to (notify them)," Lindsey argued.
However, the judge disagreed.
"The plaintiff must make the effort. You can't let (the Citizen) do it for you," Benton said. "Before you filed a complaint, you should have ran a notice somewhere, somehow.
"They might not know the law and that a lawyer could represent them anonymously," he added. "That doesn't end the process. That just starts the process."
Benton ordered Lindsey to notify the anonymous posters, informing them that they have the right to be represented or anonymously represented. They must be informed of the hearing date and have time to object; Benton felt that 30 days was enough notice to give them.
He also requested that Lindsey and Hudson submit briefs in order to be prepared upon return to the courtroom; he added that Lindsey could set up depositions of witnesses as well as Meadors and Black to "resolve a lot of the issues" before returning to the courtroom.
Other information can be obtained through the discovery process, Benton said.
"It doesn't stop you from re-filing a subpoena," he said.
Lindsey also is to show efforts to obtain information of the commenters by means other than subpoenaing the newspaper for information.
"If I allowed (the IP addresses to be released), the Newton Citizen would give the information without (the web posters) having the right to object to it," Benton said. "The Newton Citizen can't file a motion to dismiss."
Lindsey is a candidate for Newton County Superior Court judge, opposing incumbent Chief Judge John Ott, in this year's nonpartisan race.
More like this story
- Judge grants motion to quash subpoena ( July 2, 2012 )
- Carpenter asks for anonymous commenters to be dismissed from suit ( August 11, 2012 )
- Carpenter asks for anonymous bloggers to be dismissed from suit ( August 10, 2012 )
- Attorney seeks to notify web posters ( June 27, 2012 )
- Attorney says motion to stop subpoena should be denied ( June 7, 2012 )

Comments
Zo 11 months ago
Attorney Lindsey takeout an ad in both Rockdale & Newton Citizen, request for those posters to submit their real & virtual hood name to the Citizen, and the Citizen provide you the names. Also, I would offer a $100 reward for names given that ID a poster. I would do both for 30days then go back to judge for subpoena. Be prepared for another obstacle they may come back with "ID specific computer used to write post." Please post my comment.
AmazedByStupidity 11 months ago
Most lawyers know there is a specified method of informing defendants when their whereabouts are unknown. I say most; for it seems that Mrs. Lindsey has forgotten her basic methods of serving defendants. Zo, what you are suggesting is most definitely NOT the specified (and also legal) method of informing unlocated defendants.
Frustrated 11 months ago
Offer a $100 reward? You would have people crawling out of the woodwork making false ID's of people. Lindsey has to exhaust all possible means before going back to the court which would mean hiring an investigator to seek out those people. Yes you cant just cast a large net and hope to catch a fish. You do need to be specific about what you are seeking. Any attorney worth his weight would know this.
Elmo 11 months ago
Hey, "virtual hood" Zo...why don't you fork over the hundred bucks if you're so sure it will work. That way, we could find out who "Zo" really is, too! You hypocrite, you're using a "virtual hood name" too.
AWOL 11 months ago
Zoey Zoey Zoey. Once again you have an idiotic idea. Also, if the principal was white and the posters were black, you would take the opposite stance. You do not care what the issue is, you will always be behind the black person. This woman seems crazy. If you would want your kids in her school you have no brain. Please post my comment.
amp72 11 months ago
And there you have it folks. After hundreds of comments have been logged in these sites, THIS is officially the dumbest one to date. Nice work, Zo. Nice work.
Frustrated 11 months ago
If anybody knows who Zo really is, please let me know. I could use $100 right now.
mgh1966 11 months ago
No I’m Spartacus. Oh No I mean Jeff can have my $100 now
Sundance 11 months ago
It seems that Stephanie Lindsey either does not know how the court works in these types of cases or is trying to get around the rules. This article made it seem like she was trying to start the trial process in this hearing by calling witnesses and bringing evidence. Does she not know the difference between a hearing and a trial? If she is that obtuse, I would hate to see her presiding over a courtroom. This is my opinion of a candidate and public figure. I do not intend this maliciously and am basing all my opinions on facts in this article.
mrbill 11 months ago
"I don't understand why we're fighting the inevitable," she said. "There's no need to come back if we get the evidence today." This is code for, "I'm too lazy to do my due diligence." In my opinion, this is a very concerning sample of work ethic for a judicial candidate.
The property owners of Newton County, who pay the salaries of these people, deserve better than this from the NCSS and the BOE. They should have put a stop to this long before it got to this point.
noisewater4059 11 months ago
This is a ridiculous case. I'm surprised it hasn't been thrown out already.
The principal of a large high school is a public figure. Libel law states that you need to establish a pattern of malice, and the defendants have to knowingly publish false information to win a libel case. The paper is protected by state and federal shield laws. I have no idea if Ms. Carpenter is a good principal or an awful one, but she shouldn't be in the job if she can't take criticism.
Staci_Trebarwith 11 months ago
I love it when we're reduced to having to make disclaimers like Sundance.
INJUSTICE_FOR_ALL 11 months ago
maybe OBAMA will fork over the cash for his people.
Zo 11 months ago
I'm glad my suggestion got the most responses, so Attorney Lindsey I hope you use my suggestion. I would subpoena the teacher that confessed for being a poster, the one who claim a Black guy came by her house, that one. I would make her give me some names under oath. Please post my comment.
Frustrated 11 months ago
and just when I thought you were getting some common sense you disappoint me
mgh1966 11 months ago
funny thing, you start digging to hard you might find out some things you do not want out in public. Because the other side will ask for discovery.
Frustrated 11 months ago
as the saying goes..careful what you wish for
johndoemo_ 11 months ago
Zo, a roach running across the floor of a restaurant gets the most attention in a room. That doesn't mean anyone likes it.
Zo 10 months, 4 weeks ago
The roach is a conformation that the resturant is nasty. My conformation is the virtual hood community got something to hide. That's why my comment got all the attention.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID